The “Head” of the Vedas:
The word Shirah
means “head”. Shrutih Shirah means
“the Head of the Vedas”.
If spiritual life, being the highest pursuit in
life, requires the highest effort, then Mananam
is that part of spiritual life that requires the highest intellectual effort.
After listening to the Upanishads, I may
understand very clearly what Vedanta says. However, the understanding is not
complete until what Vedanta reveals becomes my own vision.
The following examples enumerate that on one
hand, I may be clear about the position of Vedanta, but on the other hand, what
it says is not totally understood and assimilated by me:
·
I
don’t have any doubt that Vedanta says I am limitless. But, I still question
how isit possible that I am limitless?
·
I
understand, that Vedanta talks about equation between I and Isvara, the cause
of the universe. But, how can I be the cause of the universe?
· I
know that Vedanta reveals that freedom (mokhsa)
is gained only through knowledge, but I consider some statement of a saint who
says that liberation is attained through devotion to Isvara to be equally true.
·
I
recognize that Vedanta talks about the self to be limitless, but I am unable to
refute the contention of some philosopher, who claims that the reality is
nothing but emptiness or a void.
If I cannot refute different contentions or
reconcile different positions, then my knowledge is still shaky and vague.
Therefore reasoning to remove all these
different kinds of doubts is employed by the teacher extensively.
During the teaching, many doubts discussed by
the teacher are raised either by the Upanishad or the commentator of the
Upanishad.
New doubts belonging to a contemporary thinking
of scientists, philosophers which did not exist in past are brought by the teacher
and answered.
Only when all doubts are discussed and resolved
by the above methods, the knowledge becomes clear and free from any
vagueness.
Regarding this effort (mananam - reflecting upon what has been heard from
preceptor/read from Upanishads), the following points help us to see what it
entails.
1. Focus of Thoughts: A magnifying glass brings
to a focal point the sunrays falling on it, so that the rays can actually set a
piece of paper alight. Our mind and intellect must also be so focused that the
thought rays get intensified to achieve greater results.
2. Deep Enquiry: Our enquiry should always
penetrate from the outermost level to the innermost level. It is at the inner
core that we start seeing the identity. On the surface level there are many
differences.
3. Correct Means: The correct means of knowledge
must be used to obtain knowledge. This is covered in Sravanam, but has to be kept in mind in Mananam to get more clarity.
4. Unattended Doubts: An unattended doubt is
like having a toothache - it will go on haunting us. We cannot afford to be
casual in this matter, but need to attend to every doubt in a meticulous and
thorough manner.
5. Perfect Preparation: Wisdom may come in a
flash, in an inspired moment, but the preparation for it takes time.
Preparation means doing all the Sadhana correctly, in the right sequence and to
the point of perfection.
6. Merciless Manana:
The Manana has to be “merciless”,
like hunting down terrorists. To allow a single terrorist to slip through our
fingers is too many.
The enquiry must be so merciless, that we must
be prepared to have our most comforting ideas shattered to pieces. We need
an intellect that is fearless and sharp – a scorching searchlight!
7. Piercing Honesty: Piercing honesty is
required on this path of enquiry. At the end of enquiry, we must be logically
convinced of the Truth. If I am not the body, then logically I cannot die. Can
I feel this?
If I am limitless, can I be indifferent to being
called either “an ignorant fool” or “a man of vast knowledge”? Both these
belong to a limited state.
Brihadaranyaaka Upanishad submits that
of the three instruments, Mind was the principal one, Vak and Praana following
thereafter which Brahman provided for
himself for his effulgence, the same are also intended for human beings on
their Path to Perfection.
It is the Mind that hears, desires,
discriminates, doubts, becomes receptive and non-receptive, resolute and
irresolute, defiled, intangible, feared – all these are but the Mind.
Therefore, even when one touches the back, the
Mind knows it.
Vak is nothing but the
vehicle through which one communicates what one has desired. Prana is the energy which gives effect
to what the Mind had desired and what the Vak
had communicated.
Therefore it is said that one be receptive,
reflective and meditative in mind before one expresses what one has been
receptive, reflective and meditative, so that finally it may be put in action,
through the power of the Prana.
One must first be receptive of knowledge of the
Self from a qualified preceptor and from scriptures, then the knowledge should
be reflected through reasoning and diligently mediated upon.
Only when these three are enjoined only then
would the Self truly realized and the unity with Brahman will be established,
not by merely hearing about the Self.
The proposition which vedanta considers as foundation are not to be only remembered,
recollected and repeated mechanically but on them one should be receptive,
reflective and meditative, since they represent what the seers had ‘seen’
‘heard’ in their enlightened awareness, without any human effort. They are
self–evident self-established and self-proved revelation of the Divine Intent
without human ingenuity.
Sankara explains that the Universal Self and the
Individual Self are essentially same, the appearance as distinct existence as
two, being the result of ignorance in Mind. He cautions one not to be tranquilized
by the rhythmic sound of the mantras, but reflect on them after understanding
the meaning. Not recitation but disciplined awareness is what is needed to lead
the Sadhaka to one to experience the resplendent Lord.
As the author has repeatedly pointed out in
various talks / posts, once a spiritual aspirant is thoroughly convinced,
beyond any doubt, beyond any wavering thoughts about the goal and the process
for attaining the goal as taught by his Guru / by scripture, the battle is half
won at that juncture itself.
More often, this “reflecting upon what has been
taught” is missing in spiritual sadhana, getting 100% convinced about the goal
is missing in spiritual sadhana and with the result, Mumukshatva is not lit up
to the fullest extent.
With the result, the next process, Nidhidhyasana, meditating and
contemplating on the single Upanishad revelation (SELF), lacks intensity, the
required inner experience is not attained and sadhana does not bear the desired
fruit.
In fact the root cause for the problem
is that a spiritual aspirant, giving importance to spiritual sessions,
gives equal importance to worldly pursuits and objective pleasure and with the
result, "he is not able to convince himself about the
conviction required on believing, confirming and then getting convinced
about contemplating on that about which he is convinced".
So, most often, Sadhana starts and
stops with Sravanam.
Love.