Verse 21
तद्वैराग्यं जिहासा या दर्शनश्रवणादिभिः ।
देहादिब्रह्मपर्यन्ते ह्यनित्ये भोगवस्तुनि ॥ २१ ॥
tadvairāgyaṃ jihāsā yā darśanaśravaṇādibhiḥ |
dehādibrahmaparyante hyanitye bhogavastuni || 21 ||
(That desire to give up all
transitory enjoyments gained through seeing, hearing and so on, and also
experiences gained through equipments ranging from a mortal body to the
form of Brahma is called ’detachment '.)
That are conducive to
joyous experiences, but it is a mental condition in which, the mind no
longer runs after the phenomenal world in the hope of gaining peace or
joy.
The idea is that
through discrimination when one has come to, at least,
intellectually appreciate that sense objects have not in themselves any
intrinsic value for joy and that they are ephemeral, naturally, the mind
will never take wandering flights into the realm of the objects with
a craving for them.
One need not prepare to
lose the permanent thing. Why? It is not lost; One need not prepare to
lose the permanent thing; because permanent thing is permanent, it is never
lost. Therefore we are talking about a losable thing. Preparedness to lose the
losable is called intelligence.
Any losable, we are
ready to lose. And the preparation is two- fold. Either I do not take that
thing at all. Either I do not possess that thing, because possess, there is the
worry of losing. Therefore either I avoid that thing; or there is no rule that
we should avoid everything. Have that thing; but be mentally ready to lose that
thing when the time comes, including life. If you take the whole life, preparedness
for death is intelligence.
It has been logically
concluded in our sastras that a man's mind will constantly hover around
and land on objects only when it is convinced that there are three
desirable qualities in them.
They are - a sense of
reality (satyatvam) of the objects, a belief in their permanency
(nityatvam) and a faith that they contain potentialities for satisfying
our craving for joy (samahitatvam).
When we understand through
discrimination that the objects perceived through the senses are all in fact
unreal (asat), ephemeral (anitya), and that they have no real capacity to
give us joy, riddled with sorrow as they are, our minds will not pant
after them.
In Sri Jnanesvara's commentary on the Bhagavad-Gita, the Yogiraja, beautifully brings out this idea in a series of inimitable similes. Describing the attitude of a man of detachment towards sense objects, he gives some examples, which are very striking and effective.
He says that a man of true
detachment will run towards sense objects with as much enthusiasm as one
would rush out to embrace a dead queen's rotting body; with as much
satisfaction as one would decide to quench one's thirst by drinking the
pus flowing out from a leper's wound and with as much readiness as
one would enter a boiling cauldron of molten iron to take a refreshing
bath.
It is a very powerful way
of expressing the idea that where the intellect has come to firm
conviction about the hollowness of sense objects, the mind will not gush
forth towards them with hopes and expectations of satisfaction therein.
This sense of detachment that arises from a full application of one's discriminative
faculty is called true 'vairagya'.
Love.