Verse 18
वृत्तयस्त्वहंवृत्तिमाश्रिताः |
वृत्तयो मनो विद्ध्यहं मनः ||
vṛttayastvahaṁvṛttimāśritāḥ |
vṛttayo mano viddhyahaṁ manaḥ ||
Modes of the mind,
now, are dependent on the “I” mode.
Modes are the mind;
know the “I” is the mind.
We
had come to this step in our discussion of Ashtanga Yoga. There, we came
to an equation where we said Mind equals a stream of thoughts. There, the
procedure went on to eliminate the objects and the subject from the equation so
that the net result would be Mind equals the Self.
Vritti
Vritti means thought
modification. Mind is but various thought forms. All these thought
forms depend upon the “I” thought.
Aham
Aham is
pure awareness without any ray of thought, without any awareness of
object. Aham is unborn and has no limitation. It is pure, not
tainted with anything at all.
This “Aham” is
the pure awareness referred in the Maha vakya, “Aham Brahmasmi”.
Ahamkara
When the
above Aham assumes a form, when one takes himself to be his
body, his sense organs, his mind etc., the “I” thought arises and the pure Aham becomes Ahankara or EGO.
To
understand “All thoughts depend on the I-thought”, we take a simple
thought and examine it: “I know a flower”. We divide this thought
into its two components: one is the object and one
the subject:
i) Idam Vritti: This
is the objective part.
The flower is the object of this thought. Thought centered upon a flower
becomes “I know a flower”. This objective part is seen to be the changeable
aspect of thought. If the flower changes, for example to “sun”, the
thought also has to change, there is no choice in the matter.
One’s feelings also
can change with the changing object. One may like a flower that is
fresh, but when it withers, the same object loses its hold on the mind,
producing a different feeling. The feeling produced by a thought is yet another
new thought all its own. It is simply related to the previous thought. Thus,
thoughts become interdependent and increase in number and complexity.
The “I”
thought will not go in spite of changes in your environment, in your
conditions.
Even if one
evolves in his thoughts, in his spiritual sadhana etc., and thinks, “I am
charitable”, “I have known SELF”, “I am a yogi” etc.,
the “I” is just gathering new thoughts, new qualifications, to remain
there.
The imposter “I
am so and so” does not quit.
ii) Aham Vritti: Independent
of the object is another part of the thought – I know. This is
the subjective part. We find that such a
thought exists all the time in the mind. We can call it the “I
am” thought (Aham = “I am”). This is the changeless aspect of
the thought. It is found attached to all our thoughts. Every thought that
crosses the mind has this I-thought attached to it as its
subject. Nothing escapes this I-thought.
The two
parts do have a relationship. ‘Idam’ cannot exist without the ‘Aham’.
The Aham helps us to connect to the Idam.
The Aham is thus more subtle. All Idam rest
on the Aham. The Aham remains the quotient in all
thoughts.
Thus, the
statement “All thoughts depend on the I-thought” is explained. If we are
to make anything of the mind, we need to get to the root of the Aham
Vritti of our thoughts.
The approach
taken by Jnana Yoga is therefore direct:
Ignore the
changing aspect or Idam Vritti, and try to get to the bottom of
the Aham-Vritti. Then we shall solve the riddle of Mind.
It has to be
remembered that Ego cannot conduct an enquiry into the “SELF” or Pure “Aham”.
Such an
enquiry is possible only through another path and that is Guru’s instructions,
Guru’s teaching.
In the
Rama’s story, when Rama could not slay Ravana with all His
strength, someone else tells Rama, “Ravana’s life lies in his heart”. It
is then that Rama aims Brahmastra at Ravana’s heart
and Ravana dies.
Ahamkara is Ravana, which is a notion, not in the head, but in the heart.
Thus, Ahamkara is in our heart and whatever we do, it
keeps coming back.
So, Ahamkara is
Ravana in us and Aham is Rama, the Lord in us.
Till the
time we do not merge in our Lord, any amount of surrender does not
work. Surrender is not complete till the time we are separate and Lord is
separate.
Till the
time this duality exists, our surrender is also a new imposter
and we are still taking refuge in Ahamkara when we say, “I
have surrendered to the Lord”.
The new qualification that we have attained is yet another identity, “One who is surrendering”.
The new qualification that we have attained is yet another identity, “One who is surrendering”.
So,
the Brahmastra that we have to use is total merger with Lord (in the context of today's post, merger with Aham) so that Ravana, our Ahamkara, dies permanently, never to return,
never to assume a new qualification, a new imposter.
Love .
No comments:
Post a Comment