Saturday, May 30, 2020

Bhagwad Gita - Post 225


Verse 13



Learn from Me, O mighty-armed Arjuna, these five causes, as declared in the Sankhya system for the accomplishment of all actions!



Verse 14



The body, the doer, the various senses, the different functions of various sorts, and the presiding Deity, also, the fifth,



Verse 15



Whatever action a man performs by his body, speech and mind, whether right or the reverse, these five are its causes.


There are five conditioning factors behind any kind of movement, action, work, or whatever it be. 


Sankhya, which is the highest knowledge, and which details the varieties of results that follow from different kinds of karmas, tells us that there are five phases of an action. 


Body


The physical body has something to say about the quantum of work that we can execute, and also the quality of work that can be expected from us. Whether our body is strong and healthy, or whether it is weak and sick, is a factor that also is to be taken into consideration when we do any work.

Hence, according to the nature of the physical condition, there will also be the conditioning of the result that follows from the action. That is one aspect among the five.


Doer - Karta / Soul


Kartā means “the doer,” and refers to the soul. Although the soul itself does not perform actions, it inspires the body-mind-intellect mechanism with the life force to act. Further, it identifies with their actions, due to the influence of the ego. 


Therefore, it is responsible for the actions performed by the body, and it is called both the knower and the doer. 


The Prasna Upanihad states: 


“It is the soul that sees, touches, hears, feels, tastes, thinks, and comprehends. Thus, the soul is to be considered both—the knower and the doer of actions.” 


For easier comprehension, we can understand this as soul+samskara or in very broader terms, the ego factor.


Various senses 


The instruments that we use in the performance of action also condition the work. Suppose we dig a pit. If we dig with our hands, we will get one type of result; but if we use a pickaxe or a shovel, or a bulldozer, then different kinds of results will follow. The kind of instrument that we use in the performance of action will also decide what kind of result will follow.


So, it is about how our 5 Karma Indriyas are used, that the action shapes up.



Different functions of Mind


Even when we are doing one work, twenty ideas may be in our mind at the same time, pulling us in different directions, and it does not mean that a person thinks only one thought at a time. Even when we are doing one work, if we are able to think only that and nothing else, we are really a great person. But, generally that is not possible. 


There is a memory of something that happened in the past, and an apprehension of something that could take place in the future, and a fear of something that is in the present.

These will distract the mind. These operations of the mind which distract are also conditioning factors in the performance of the work.


Proper functioning of mind with focused intellect / viveka is what we have understood as Self Efforts or purushartha and depending upon how we exercise this factor, our actions are performed by us. 


Presiding deity

This has been explained by various commentators in different ways.


Some say, these are the five elements.


Some say, this is the Atman and they justify this as under:-


“The five factors are the physical body, the five senses such eyes, ears, etc., the ego, the life airs which govern breathing and the atma the controller of them all. 


The Vedanta Sutra II.III.XXXIII beginning upadanat states: The atma of the jiva or embodied being at the death of the physical body takes the pranas along with it; therefore the atma is the controller.”


However, most appealing is the interpretation given by Swami Krishnananda who says, this is Divine providence or the cosmic will and explains,


“A thing that is not sanctioned by the Ultimate Will of the universe will not take place, however much we may sweat. That which is to happen will happen, whatever be our effort to prevent it; and that which is not to happen will not happen, even if we call for it. This is the inscrutable factor operating behind all things. 


Our very mind, our very body, our egoism, our mental faculty, our very existence, is conditioned by the central Cosmic Will; and if it does not permit any event to take place, that event will never take place even if millions of people work hard to make it happen. 



Whatever be our effort in the direction of guarding our person, our society, or our country, it has to be sanctioned by the Supreme Will. As Sri Krishna told Arjuna, “Go ahead. You will succeed.” But that sanction was not there for the Kauravas, and the opposite result followed.


Thus, the final operative factor is the central Universal Will, with which we have to always stand in a state of union and communion. We should not egoistically assert too much of our own individual agency in action. We are not the only agents. There are five agents in the performance of an action, and among those five there is one supreme principle which we cannot afford to forget: the existence of God in the world. The principle of divinity permeating all things—the immanence of God—ultimately decides all factors, though others also act as instruments”.

Love.






Thursday, May 28, 2020

Bhagwad Gita - Post 224


Verse 10



The man of renunciation, pervaded by purity, intelligent and with his doubts cut asunder, does not hate a disagreeable work nor is he attached to an agreeable one.



The person who renounces attachment due the preponderance of the sattva guna in him, who is very intelligent in perceiving the pros and cons of things, and has no doubt whatsoever about the way in which work is to be done, hating not painful work, clinging not to pleasurable work, such a person is really an example before us. 


It does not mean that we should cling to something because it is pleasant, nor does it mean that we should hate something because it is not pleasant. 


Na dveṣṭy akuśala karma kuśale nānuajjate: The pleasant form of work does not call for attraction, nor should it evoke hatred when it is painful work calling for hard labour on our part. 


In as much as the ego-sense is absent there is no impetus to exhibit aversion or attraction for either one or the other and since all other goals have been relinquished and resigned with the exception of moksa or final emancipation from material existence as revealed in Vedic scriptures then one is truly established in ultimate renunciation. 


Thus the conclusion is that relinquishing all ego-sense of authorship and abandoning any desire for rewards is actual renunciation and not mere abstention from actions.


This state of existence is echoed in Ashtavakra Gita in the following verse 



(Liberation is when the mind does not long for anything, grieve about anything, reject anything, or hold on to anything, and is not pleased about anything or displeased about anything.)


(Chapter 8, verse 2)


The verse speaks of acceptance of an action which is agreeable or rejection of an action which is disagreeable.


The question is- Agreeable or disagreeable to WHAT?


It is agreeable / disagreeable to one’s EGO, dominated by Rajas/Tamas.


And, Ashtavakra says, the one who has transcended EGO, stands liberated at that very moment and there is no ego to say, "O Yes, this I shall accept” or to frown, “O No, this I reject”.




Verse 11



Verily, it is not possible for an embodied being to abandon actions entirely; but he who relinquishes the rewards of actions is verily called a man of renunciation.



No embodied person can totally be free from work. The very fact of our being in a body calls for some kind of engagement because this body is made up of physical matter and, therefore, it is a form of prakriti constituted of the three gunassattvarajas and tamas


In as much as prakriti is always in a state of disturbance—it is not in a state of equilibrium—and its properties of sattvarajas and tamas are constantly moving in a cyclic fashion, they compel the body to also be subject to that kind of cyclic action because the physical body of a human being, or of anything whatsoever, is not free from the contingency arising from the operation of the three gunas.


Abandoning work is, therefore, not possible as long as we have a body. But we shall be free from the binding effect of karma, or action, provided we do not look to the effect, or the fruit, that accrues from the work. 


We should do our work because it is necessary to work for the welfare of everybody, not because we get some recompense out of it. 


Sattvic work is work done for work’s sake only, whether or not it brings any fruit. Actually, every duty performed well—in a most unselfish manner—will, of its own accord, bring a result which is most pleasant, and we need not ask for it. 


Love.






Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Bhagwad Gita - Post 223


Verse 7
 

Verily, the renunciation of obligatory action is improper; the abandonment of the same from delusion is declared to be Tamasic.


An obligatory duty is that kind of work or performance which is organically related to our very survival and existence in this world and is interrelated to other beings in the world. 


Our existence is conditioned by certain obligations to the atmosphere or the environment of the society in which we are living, and if this point is missed due to any intense form of selfishness on one’s part—one works for one’s own welfare very ignorantly, not considering the internal relationship that one bears consciously or unconsciously with the outer atmosphere—if this ignorance is going to be the motive behind one’s action, deluded is that person.


Abandonment of such obligatory duties is considered by the Lord as the lowest and the darkest (Tamasic). Every individual has his own obligations to himself and to others in society.



Verse 8




He who abandons action on account of the fear of bodily trouble (because it is painful), he does not obtain the merit of renunciation by doing such Rajasic renunciation.


Tamasic relinquishment is mentioned as that form of abandonment of action.


There is another relinquishment, called rajasic tyaga: “Because it is difficult—it is very painful, it involves a lot of hardship, I have to work, day and night—therefore, I will not do that work.” This argument for not doing a work is not actually feasible or tenable. 


The reason for not doing a work should not be merely the fact that it is a strain upon oneself to do hard work. We have to sweat, and “I do not want to sweat; therefore, I will not do this work. Physically it is painful, torturous and, therefore, I am afraid of doing this kind of work or undertaking this project”. When a person abandons doing a work because it is painful and requires hard labour on their part, that kind of abandonment of work is called rajasic tyaga. It is not sattvic.


  
Verse 9




Whatever obligatory action is done, O Arjuna, merely because it ought to be done, abandoning attachment and also the desire for reward, that renunciation is regarded as Sattwic!


Sattvic renunciation does not mean renunciation of action. Then, what does it mean? It is the doing of one’s work because it is something that must be done under the circumstances in which one is placed. 


Kāryam ityeva yat karma niyata: “Definitely it has to be done, because it is binding upon me. Yet, I shall do that work but be free from attachment to the work.” It does not mean that we should be attached to duty. The performance of duty is an impersonal involvement of ourselves in a call that is super-individual and it does not call for attachment. 


Attachment is an emotional clinging to a particular form, event or anything whatsoever; and duty, being a superior call from a law that is above human nature, cannot be an object of attachment. 


Therefore, when a person performs a work as a duty incumbent upon that person and yet never feels that it is ‘my’ work, and he knows that it is not anyone’s work but it is a work done for the work’s sake, and he does not expect any recompense or fruit thereof—such an impersonally construed unselfish action done for the sake of work alone can be regarded as sattvic action. All other kinds of work are rajasic or tamasic.



Love.



Sunday, May 24, 2020

Bhagwad Gita - Post 222


Verse 3


Some philosophers declare that all actions should be abandoned as an evil, while others declare that acts of gift, sacrifice and austerity should not be relinquished.




Verse 4


Hear from Me the conclusion or the final truth about this abandonment, O best of the Bharatas; abandonment, verily, O best of men, has been declared to be of three kinds!



Verse 5


Acts of sacrifice, gift and austerity should not be abandoned, but should be performed; Sacrifice, gift and also austerity are the purifiers of the wise.




Verse 6



But even these actions should be performed leaving aside attachment and the desire for rewards, O Arjuna! This is My certain and best conviction.


Arjuna nods in agreement of Lord’s exposition and the Lord continues.


“Some wise ones say that every action is defective. Sri Krishna himself says that any undertaking is defective because we will come a cropper one day or the other, whatever be the project that we undertake or the work that we do. 


Because of the fact that there is a defect in every kind of undertaking, in any kind of action, action should be abandoned. This is the opinion of certain ancient Masters. 


But other great ones tell us that not all actions should be abandoned under the impression that they are all defective, because there are certain actions which are purifying in their nature, and they are obligatory on the part of every person. These actions—namely, yajna, dana and tapas—are very necessary for all people. 


“I shall clinch the matter by firmly telling you that yajna, dana and tapas should not be abandoned under the impression that they are actions that have some defect.” What is yajna, what is dana, what is tapas


Tapas pertains to us, dana pertains to others, and sacrifice, or yajna, pertains to the gods. 


We have a duty towards ourselves, a duty towards others, and a duty towards the Supreme Divinity manifesting itself as the controlling power of the cosmos. Therefore, we cannot say that we shall not do anything. We have to do something for our welfare, for others’ welfare, and for the satisfaction of God Himself. 


The sacrifice that we perform for the satisfaction of the Supreme Divinity, which is the ultimate sacrifice, is called yajna.



The charity that we do for the pleasure of people and the welfare of people is called dana, or philanthropic deeds. 


However, while performing such actions, one should give up the desires which motivate such acts.


For example, a rich man may give a lot of wealth in charity, wanting at the same time, a lot of publicity. Far better it is to offer charity with a noble feeling that it would bring relief and comfort to the needy and also make the Lord (in the giver and in the receiver) happy.


Tapas—inward austerity, self-control, self-discipline, restraint of the mind and the sense organs—is a duty of every person seeking God.


Therefore, we cannot say, “It is an action; therefore, I will not do it”.  We have to do it because tapas is conducive to our welfare, charity or dana is conducive to the welfare of others, and yajna or sacrifice is conducive to the satisfaction of God Himself. 


Therefore, I tell you, yajna, dana and tapas should not be abandoned. They must be done; they are imperative duties.”


All these duties, when properly pursued, bring about a brilliant discipline within and create conditions under which alone, the highest spiritual unfoldment and the final experience of the Infinite are possible. 


Krishna says here that these can "purify even thoughtful men." Men of evolutionary tendencies, who seek freedom from their personality obsessions must, with devotion and the right attitude of mind, perform Yajnas, Daana and Tapas. Thereby they can discover an endless amount of inner peace and balance.


Love.





Friday, May 22, 2020

Bhagwad Gita - Post 221


Verse 1
 
Arjuna said:


I desire to know severally, O mighty - armed, the essence or truth of renunciation, O Hrishikesa, as also of abandonment, O slayer of Kesi!


The sacred dialogue between Krishna and Arjuna began with the latter surrendering to the Lord and asking Him, “I do not know what I should do, please guide me”


The Lord did not say, “get up and fight”.


Arjuna had surrendered. 


And, when a devotee surrenders, then what is the impact of such surrender on Lord??.

Swami says, “Lord’s heart is like a soft butter”. (Melting at the TRUE surrender of His devotee)


Hence, the Lord starts explaining “why, Arjuna has to get up and fight”


The celestial song was thus heard by Arjuna (and by spiritual aspirants for all ages to come after that) .


17 discourses (chapters) have been given by the Lord. Arjuna still has some lingering doubts and he wants the same to be cleared.


Arjuna asks, “O Lord, In spite of Your patient instruction, I am still not clear about the distinction between Renunciation (Sanyasa) and Sacrifice (Tyaga). Please would you bear with me and explain once more the difference ? 




Verse 2


The Blessed Lord Said:


The sages understand Sannyas to be the renunciation of action with desire; the wise declare the abandonment of the fruits of all actions as Tyaga.



The Lord smiles and replies,


“Yes Arjuna, it is important that all doubts are completely resolved before you plunge into war. I shall explain and clear your doubt.


Some people say that since actions are rooted in desires and personal ambitions, all actions are best avoided, and that is the correct way to desire lessness.


Reflect calmly. Could this view be correct??


Action, which is charged with a motive, any kind of motivated action, is kamya karma; and the abandoning of kamya karma, or motivated action, is sannyasa. This is the definition of sannyasa given by great ancient learned ones, called kavissamnyasam kavayo viduh.


If action is to be totally avoided/abandoned, then what would be the fate of all duties?


Agreed that desires must be conquered but is there not a way of performing action and still keeping the desires out?


If you ask me, it is not the actions that should be renounced but the desire for the fruit of action (Karma Phala Tyaga) that must be given up. 


Indeed, the wise describe the abandonment of “desire for fruit of action” as Tyaga.


Love.




Thursday, May 21, 2020

Bhagwad Gita - Post 220


Chapter 18

THE YOGA OF LIBERATION BY RENUNCIATION
(…continued)


Verse 65

Fix thy mind on Me, be devoted to Me, sacrifice to Me, bow down to Me. Thou shalt come even to Me; truly do I promise unto thee, (for) thou art dear to Me.


Verse 66

Abandoning all duties, take refuge in Me alone; I will liberate thee from all sins; grieve not.


Verse 67

This is never to be spoken by thee to one who is devoid of austerities, to one who is not devoted, nor to one who does not render service, nor who does not desire to listen, nor to one who cavils at Me.


Verse 68

He who with supreme devotion to Me will teach this supreme secret to My devotees, shall doubtless come to Me.


Verse 69

Nor is there any among men who does dearer service to Me, nor shall there be another on earth dearer to Me than he.


Verse 70

And he who will study this sacred dialogue of ours, by him I shall have been worshipped by the sacrifice of wisdom; such is My conviction.


Verse 71

The man also who hears this, full of faith and free from malice, he, too, liberated, shall attain to the happy worlds of those of righteous deeds.


Verse 72

Has this been heard, O Arjuna, with one-pointed mind? Has the delusion of thy ignorance been fully destroyed, O Dhananjaya?


Verse 73

Arjuna said:

Destroyed is my delusion as I have gained my memory (knowledge) through Thy Grace, O Krishna! I am firm; my doubts are gone. I will act according to Thy word.


Verse 74

Sanjaya said:

Thus have I heard this wonderful dialogue between Krishna and the high-souled Arjuna, which causes the hair to stand on end.


Verse 75

Through the Grace of Vyasa I have heard this supreme and most secret Yoga direct from Krishna, the Lord of Yoga Himself declaring it.



Verse 76

O King, remembering this wonderful and holy dialogue between Krishna and Arjuna, I rejoice again and again!


Verse 77

And remembering again and again also that most wonderful form of Hari, great is my wonder, O King! And I rejoice again and again!


Verse 78

Wherever there is Krishna, the Lord of Yoga, wherever there is Arjuna, the archer, there are prosperity, happiness, victory and firm policy; such is my conviction.




Thus in the Upanishads of the glorious Bhagavad Gita, the science of the Eternal, the scripture of Yoga, the dialogue between Sri Krishna and Arjuna, ends the eighteenth discourse entitled:

“The Yoga of Liberation by Renunciation”

Om Shanti! Shanti! Shanti!


Love.