MAYA AND CREATION
Athah Chatur vimshati Tattva
Utpatti prakaranam
Vakshyaamah
Now then, the twenty four principles
And how they evolved from the beginning
shall be explained
All the studies that we
did till now, whether Sharira Trayam or Avastha Trayam are all associated with
the individual or microcosm. In Sanskrit we use the word Vyashti.
Today we are going to
the next topic through which we are entering Samashti or macrocosm. The topic
is Srishtihi or creation or cosmology.
We begin with the 24
factors that are going to be enumerated hereunder, and whose evolution is going
to be explained.
The 24 Factors are (from
grossest to subtlest):
ii) The five Pranas;
iii) The five
Karmendriyas;
iv) The five Jnanendriyas;
v) The fourfold
Antahkarana, namely, mind, memory, intellect and the ego.
These add up to 24 Factors. There is a 25th factor we speak of and it is called Maya. However, we do not count it here because it is not an evolute of creation. It is causeless and so has no beginning. Thus it is not part of the “evolution” of the universe, it is the primary factor from which all the 24 Factors have arisen.
These add up to 24 Factors. There is a 25th factor we speak of and it is called Maya. However, we do not count it here because it is not an evolute of creation. It is causeless and so has no beginning. Thus it is not part of the “evolution” of the universe, it is the primary factor from which all the 24 Factors have arisen.
MAYA
The term Maya appears in
the Svetasvatara Upanishad and in the Gita, chapter VII-14, Mama Maya - the
divine illusion of Mine. Svetasvatara Upanishad IV-10 declares that Maya is the
material cause of the world and the possessor of Maya is the great Lord.
Maya is that portion of
the primitive non-intelligent principle in which pure Sattva is not subordinated
to Rajas and Tamas. In other words, that portion in which pure Sattva is
predominant is called Maya. The world is regarded as Maya, as it cannot be
accepted as real.
Does Maya really exist
or not? The Advaitin gives a reply: This inscrutable, indescribable Maya cannot
be said either to exist or not to exist. It is a strange phenomenon which
cannot be accounted by any law of nature.
Maya is Anirvachaniya
i.e., incapable of being described. It is neither Sat (real) like Brahman nor
Asat (unreal) like a barren woman's son or horn of a hare or a lotus flower in
the sky.
The phenomena produced
by a magician do not really exist, because they vanish soon. The magician
himself is fully aware that it is mere illusion. But we cannot say that they do
not exist at all, because we are conscious of the phenomena, though only for a
short time.
We are never conscious
of a thing which is altogether non-existent like the lotus flower in the sky.
Similar is the phenomenon called the universe which is imagined to be distinct
from Brahman.
It is like the silver
for which the mother-of-pearl is mistaken. It is difficult to conceive how the
infinite comes out of itself into the finite. The magician brings out a mango
tree before us from out of nothing. The tree is there, though we cannot explain
it. So we call it Maya or illusion.
If we know the nature of
the Brahman, all names and forms and limitations will melt away. The world is
Maya as it is not the essential truth of the infinite reality of the
Brahman.
The world somehow exists
and its relation to the Brahman is indescribable. The illusion vanishes by
attainment of knowledge of the Brahman. Sages, Rishis and Srutis emphatically
declare that the Maya vanishes entirely as soon as the knowledge of the Supreme
Self dawns.
Maya in Vedanta and in
general in Hindu philosophy is seen as the great illusory power behind
creation. It is a projection of illusion upon the substratum of Brahman, using
the three primary qualities called the Gunas, namely, Sattwa, Rajas and Tamas,
as the building blocks of this entire creation.
The word Maya literally
stands for “ya ma sa maya” – meaning that which is not but which appears to be.
From the standpoint of Truth there is no world. As far as the rope is
concerned, there never was a snake. Yet we experience the world, illusory or
unreal though it be, and we cannot simply deny its existence.
Maya has two major
powers:
i) Avaharana
Shakti: This is the “Veiling Power” by which the Truth or nature of Brahman is
kept hidden from our knowledge. Due to it, there arises
the non-apprehension of the Truth.
ii) Vikshepa
Shakti: This is the “Projecting Power” by which the world is ‘projected’ rather
than created. The Indian philosophers do not give this world the status of
reality and hence the term ‘projection’ is more appropriate to it. Due to it,
there arises the mis-apprehension of the Truth; the unreal is taken to be the
Real.
The veiling power has to
precede the projection. If that were not so, then the snake would not be seen for
the rope in the first place. Everything that is created by Maya has these two
powers. The veiling is built-in, as it were, and each living being has some
power to extend creation within the limitations imposed upon it by its
particular body.
Differences between Maya and Brahman
And what is the common
feature of Brahman and Maya? Both are beginning-less. They have no origin. And
what are their differences? Differences are more to be noted:
- Brahman is the
non-material consciousness whereas Maya is material principle.
- Brahman the
consciousness being beyond time and space, is never subject to change.
Therefore, it is changeless. Whereas Maya the matter principle can never remain
the same.
- The consciousness
principle is Nirvikalpa not subject to spatial division – here one
consciousness, there one consciousness : this can never arise. It is
division-less and beyond time and space.
Whereas Maya the
material is subject to multiplication and division. Maya is like an amoeba
where it multiples by division. Maya can multiply into the cosmos by
division.
These are the basic
differences between Brahman and Maya and out of this mixture alone this
universe manifests out of the seed which is Maya. In our scriptures the word
Creation is always replaced by the word Manifestation.
Love.
No comments:
Post a Comment